Monday, May 27, 2013

341 - What Freedom is All About

Spirituality Column #341
May 28, 2013
Current in Carmel–Westfield–Noblesville–Fishers–Zionsville

What Freedom is All About
By Bob Walters

My maternal grandfather Dr. Alexander R. McKinney (1885-1964) was a kindly, good-humored ophthalmologist – an eye doctor – in Saginaw, Mich.

He was also a field surgeon with the U.S. Army in Europe during World War I.  Among the personal effects my family received after his death was a duffle bag containing various army artifacts – gas mask, dough-boy helmet, knapsack, a cartridge belt and a physician’s “black bag” imprinted with “Capt. A.R. McKinney.”

In 1964 I was 10 years old and the “real army gear” served as coveted playthings for my younger brother Joe and me.  But the most special item showed up years later in the mail from my older sister Linda, who had sorted through my mother’s things after she died in 2003.  It was “Grandpa Doc’s” 1917 army field version of The Gospel of St. John, a shirt-pocket-sized inspirational booklet distributed to millions of soldiers around the globe during “The Great War.”

This particular, apparently well-used artifact has “Dr. A.R. McKinney, MD” written inside the cover, in pencil, in a doctor’s scrawl, just below what appears to be a blood stain at the top of the page.

The small booklet, “Dedicated to Our Soldier Boys,” was British in origin but distributed by The Free Tract Society of “Los Angeles, Calif.  U. S. A.”  On the cover is printed, “Send for samples of literature and as you go, PREACH.”

This “Special Features Edition” contains the fourth Gospel, the 23rd Psalm, a four-point Plan of Salvation, the Lord’s Prayer (“debts” not “trespasses,” if you’re wondering), hymn lyrics (“Just as I Am,” “Onward Christian Soldiers,” “Rock of Ages” and others), and “Testaments on the Battlefield”: some words of both courage and encouragement meant for soldiers, sailors, and mothers.

“Seventeen millions” Khaki (army) and blue Navy editions, plus other books, were distributed worldwide.  The tract’s stated purpose was to encourage others “to accept not only these Gospels but Jesus Himself as their personal Savior.”

What I don’t know exactly is how this tract book got into my grandfather’s hands, but I have a strong hunch – in fact I have no doubt – that the United States Army was enthusiastically complicit in the books’ arrival into Grandpa Doc’s possession.

With groups today trying to make any witness of Jesus Christ within the US military a court martial offense, I have this thought:

On Memorial Day, we honor those who died for our freedom.  At the top of that list, for all of mankind, is Jesus Christ.  As long as America trusts in God, its defenders must be allowed, if they so choose, to trust in Jesus Christ.

That’s what freedom is all about.

Walters (rlwcom@aol.com) notes that Grandpa Doc was a devout, teetotaling (non-drinking) Presbyterian.
Monday, May 20, 2013

340 - For Christ's Sake, Am I Saved?

Spirituality Column #340
May 21, 2013
Current in Carmel–Westfield–Noblesville–Fishers–Zionsville

For Christ’s Sake, Am I Saved?
By Bob Walters

Christian believers spend a lot of time wondering if they are “really saved.”

The unsatisfying answer is … there is no way to “know,” at least not like that.

Not if we are demanding answers from God.  Not if we are focused on our own needs.  Not if we are measuring our estimable good works against God’s perfect grace.  Not if we imagine that our salvation in Christ is some sort of transaction, trade, or competitive status symbol.  Not if we think God owes us an explanation.  Not if we are challenging God to hold up His end of the “deal.”  Not if we insist on an answer right this minute or else accuse God of fraud.

That’s the wrong entry to the topic; it’s the worldly door of me-first, off-point, give-me-something-in-return religion.  It amounts to defining God in our image and tantamount to imagining that we carry managerial status in the Kingdom of God.

Salvation doesn’t come from God answering our questions; salvation comes from our having faith in God.  It’s a point the Bible makes repeatedly:

“Jesus said to the woman, ‘Your faith has saved you, go in peace” (Luke 7:50),

“For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you profess your faith and are saved” (Paul in Romans 10:10),

“For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith – and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God” (Paul in Ephesians 2:8),

“But we do not belong to those who shrink back and are destroyed, but to those who have faith and are saved” (Hebrews 10:39).

Faith, you’ll notice, provides the answer to the question, “Am I saved?”  If I trust God that I am, and have faith that I am, then I am, because that’s what the Bible says.

And really, the question should not be, “Am I saved?”  The question should be, “Do I trust God’s faithfulness?”  If we put Jesus first, and if we put our neighbor first – truly, truly put them first (Luke 10:27) – then we won’t have the time, the inclination, or the need to check on our soteriological status.  We’ll already be living the Kingdom life.

Remember, it’s not enough to merely “believe” – even Satan believes in Jesus (Matthew 4), but Satan is out for his own glory, not God’s.  We must love, worship, glorify, trust, and as best we can, obey God.  This is where our joy in the Lord resides.

On the cross, Jesus did the heavy lifting of salvation.  For His sake, He did His job well.

Walters (rlwcom@aol.com) notes that many people who argue about salvation don’t really believe in salvation.
Monday, May 13, 2013

339 - God Is Paying Close Attention

Spirituality Column #339
May 14, 2013
Current in Carmel–Westfield–Noblesville–Fishers–Zionsville

God Is Paying Close Attention
By Bob Walters

An intelligent but dependably maddening uber-liberal Facebook friend recently posted a thought on “traditional marriage.”

Ordinarily not one to quote the Bible, he nonetheless cited 1 Kings 11:3: “(Solomon) had seven hundred wives …and three hundred concubines.”  My friend expresses “a lot more of a problem with that” (Solomon’s nuptials) than with modern “marriage equality.”  Why shouldn’t two people of the same gender marry, he reasons, since it won’t affect “anyone else’s life, let alone heterosexual marriage”?

On the one hand, my friend is in complete agreement with God, who also had a problem with Solomon’s multiple wives and concubines.  But the Bible’s lesson about Solomon’s wives doesn’t center on marriage; it centers ultimately on the sin of turning away from God and worshipping pagan idols.  Solomon’s wives were no blessing from God; they were the forbidden fruit of Solomon’s earthly wealth.  In reading the entire verse, we learn that Solomon’s foreign “wives led him astray.”

My friend’s fault here is called “proof texting,” or building a doctrine, a broad opinion, or an argument around a small piece of scripture taken out of context.  Here, by expressing a degree of revulsion with a selected scriptural snippet about Solomon’s wives, he is insinuating that since God doesn’t seem to care about marriage then, we shouldn’t worry about who marries whom in our society now.
 
Given the current prominence of the “gay marriage” issue (which my friend has deftly cloaked as a “traditional marriage” issue), this particular Facebook post was obviously more of a political purpose pitch than a knowledgeable Biblical observation.  It is a disingenuous misinterpretation of an incomplete piece of scripture buttressing the modern, man-pleasing secular estimation that our marriage appetites “don’t affect anybody else.”  From 1 Kings 11:3, we can be sure God is paying close attention to who marries whom, and that it definitely affects and matters to Him.
 
Better to read all of chapter 11 and learn how seriously God takes not only marriage, but His first commandment: “You will have no other God but me.”  Solomon was wise, but disobedient, and it cost him.
 
Better still to reflect on all of scripture realizing God’s faithfulness and personality in the Old Testament and beholding the magnificence of God’s grace through Jesus Christ in the New Testament. 

My friend is smart, but he doesn’t know the Bible.  Or if he does, he is trying to sneak an earthly agenda in on God.
 
That’s never a good idea, and there is a lot of that going around.

Walters (rlwcom@aol.com) understands there are diverse social and political views, but doesn’t understand why so many folks consistently resist the Bible’s authority but persistently insist on quoting from it.

 
 
Monday, May 6, 2013

338 - God's Life is Pretty Involved

Spirituality Column #338
May 7, 2013
Current in Carmel – Westfield – Noblesville – Fishers – Zionsville

God’s Life is Pretty Involved
By Bob Walters
 
As deeply as I believe God made mankind in His image, I am similarly as convinced God’s life is very different from ours.
 
This does not require deep theology.  I simply believe Genesis 1:27, “God created man in His image” and God’s declaration in Isaiah 55:8-9, “… my ways are higher than your ways.”  But, to paraphrase, if we are “sort of like God” yet also “very different from God,” no wonder so many people are understandably and intellectually perplexed about God’s transcendent life.  How do we have a relationship with that?
 
Generally we think of God as eternally unchanging; the same yesterday, today, and tomorrow.  Fine.  But the strict doctrine of an “Impassible” (unchanging) God is a pagan notion dating to pre-Christian Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle, which then took hold in the early Christian church.  “Impassible” means God is perpetually perfect and unaffected.  Hence, any change – necessarily toward “less perfect” or “more perfect” – is impossible.
 
So we can’t just say “God doesn’t change” and dismiss Sunday school.
 
If God is truly unchanging, then what is God’s life?  “No change” means no involvement – no joy, success, mirth, pursuit, accomplishment, anger, hurt, suffering, fatigue, wrath, mercy, or work; very little we read in the Bible about God’s life and relationship with mankind could be true.  Therefore it seems to be a faith mistake of considerable magnitude – or at least a glaring inconsistency – to accept both “God is love” (1 John 4:7, 8, 16), a relationship, and concentrically insist that God’s life is an unblinking, sterile, unfeeling, uninvolved “justice” devoid of mercy or condemnation.  Both mercy and condemnation require consideration, suggest change, and imply movement, i.e., life.
 
Somehow God is both perfect and involved, though, unlike people, I don’t see God needing to grow, mature or be dependent … or ever being surprised.  But neither can I imagine God’s perfect life consisting of a one-sided, non-relational love that is merely a static observation.  The highest virtue of the Trinity, the Godhead, is that it is a loving, eternal, relational and involved community that God through Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit graciously shares with us.  Our blessing is to accept God’s gift of relationship in faith and return our love with thankfulness and humility.
 
Jesus, fully God and fully man, entered time and history to defeat death, restore fallen creation, forgive sins, and rekindle human relationship with God.  Rather than debate whether “God changes,” our best move is to believe the truth of Christ and live for the glory of God.
 
It’s our lives that we need to worry about changing; not God’s.
 
Walters (rlwcom@aol.com) believes God’s grace, truth, love, and justice are unchanging, absolute, mysterious, and entirely on His terms.

 

Archives

Labels

Enter your email address to get updated about new content:

Popular Posts