Showing posts with label morals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label morals. Show all posts
Monday, July 23, 2018

610 - Founding Faith

Spirituality Column #610
July 24, 2018
Common Christianity / Uncommon Commentary

Founding Faith
By Bob Walters

"Consider it pure joy, my brothers and sisters, whenever you face trials of many kinds, because you know that the testing of your faith provides perseverance." - James 1:2-3

Last week I wrote of my profound skepticism that Christianity in America is in as bad a shape as the media and academia would have us believe.

I believe America remains blessed, fortunate … downright lucky.  Christians here complain about assorted secular social lunacies.  Non-believers chortle at what they perceive to be hypocrisies and foolishness of Christian faith.  And nobody dies at trial.

The Persecuted Church is alive and suffering in many corners of the world – the Middle East, central Africa, south Asia, and China to name just a few.  Christianity is arguably healthier in those areas than it is in sophisticated Europe where it is nearly dead of pompous neglect.  The civil challenges to faith American Christians meet here at home give us a necessary taste of perseverance-producing intellectual trials without the savagery and abandonment of physical brutality and total agnostic arrogance.

The Bible promises that faith in the love of Christ will give us joy and persecution. When I consider the modern robustness of American churches – seriously, look at the churches, not the media – and the general calmness and civility of domestic religious dialog – even non-church goers say “Thank God!” when something goes their way – it brings to mind a foundational question: Why is America so different?

I think I found the answer in the 2008 book Founding Faith by Steven Waldman.

This deeply researched, thoroughly footnoted, painstakingly cited, and elegantly succinct work focuses on the development of American religious freedom from the Jamestown settlement in 1607 onward through the early years of the republic.  There is Reformation, British, and Enlightenment church history. There is also the “theology” and pragmatism of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Ben Franklin, James Madison and other founding fathers that I was thoroughly unprepared to read.

Waldman’s book is different because it does not try to bludgeon a “Christian” or “Non-Christian” creation of America.  Instead it reveals the reality of the true awfulness of inter-Christian persecution and colonial sectarian separatism and how that conflict developed into a union perpetuating and insisting on liberty – a miracle, if you ask me.

Anglicans, Puritans, Lutherans, Anabaptists, Presbyterians, Quakers, Catholics, Evangelicals, Methodists, Baptists, Reformed, and others arrived on North American shores and promptly, vigorously, and legally discriminated against each other.  Colonies were settled by sect.  Puritans harassed Baptists; Quakers were distrusted; Catholics were shunned; priests were often suspect.  Few folks actually attended church yet most had a moral connection to Jesus while harboring suspicions of and violent aversion to competing Christian doctrines.  Militarily, the Revolutionary War required Christian religious pluralism to fight robustly against the tyranny of the Crown’s Anglican Church.

Refreshingly, Waldman’s treatment is not exclusively Enlightenment agnosticism, Sunday school sanitation, patriotic jingoism, or anti-colonial screed.  It is a thoughtful, illuminating, and surprising look at the American union of civil and religious freedom.

The founders’ faith and perseverance made it look easy.  It was far from it.

Walters (rlwcom@aol.com) more fully appreciates how good we have it … now.

Monday, July 4, 2016

503 - Dignity in the Dock

Spirituality Column No. 503
July 5, 2016
Common Christianity / Uncommon Commentary

Dignity in the Dock
By Bob Walters

Dignitary Harm (legal definition): The pain of being told by others that your choices are immoral.
 
Think of it this way.  If I steal your wallet, I have committed “material harm.”  If you tell me stealing your wallet is immoral, you have committed “dignitary harm” on me.
 
Make sense?  Yeah I know, not really …
 
But, it’s a real term: “dignitary harm.”  Legal academics have invented it recently – yes here in America – to describe the shocking awfulness of telling someone that right and wrong matter, that this is right and that is wrong, and that I love you enough to rebuke / counsel / correct your behavior.
 
Never mind that the U.S. Constitution’s “free speech” clause in the Bill of Rights codifies and expresses the endowment by our Creator of our mutual right of oppositional comment.  I may not like your actions and you may not like my religion, but  whether the topic is politics, entertainment, child rearing, global warming, body piercing, tattoos, gun control, immigration, personal determinism vs. nationalism vs. globalism, or whatever you can come up with to argue about, it’s a free country and we are free by God’s grace and by law to tell each other about it.
 
Except, of course, in the case of the sex-and-reproduction culture wars where the rights and legal argument run only one way.  Here, any perpetrator of moral dissonance against God’s clear biblical plan retains his or her (you pick which) right to ridicule the Creator as morally insufficient while dismissively mocking as intellectually backwards my faith and trust in God, His Son, His Spirit and His Word.
 
To avoid committing “dignitary harm” for noticing, labeling and defining “sin” as sin, I am free only to express acceptance and encouragement of these obvious transgressions, lest I commit the sin of thinking, er, judgment.  The public forum enforces this unholy ban on questioning the morality of gay marriage and all things LGBT.  “Caitlyn,” you may recall, got an ESPN courage award.
 
Abortion of course remains a manufactured but fiercely protected “right” which, oxymoronically, denies the basic right of life.  Material harm?  Absolutely; but no foul.  Say abortion is immoral, thus committing “dignitary harm”? That’s an actionable tort.
 
If we go to a church that’s worth our time we should all get a good dose of “dignitary harm” every Sunday morning.  It actually is a pretty effective way to encounter the sin in our lives – my sin, let’s start there – and gaze for guidance to the moral perfection of Jesus who suffered the ultimate “dignitary harm” on the cross.
 
Our lives are that precious and God’s plan is that perfect.
 
Telling others about it is the moral thing to do.
 
Walters (rlwcom@aol.com) knows God created us all.  Too bad so many of us think we created Him.
Monday, April 13, 2015

439 - Praying for Parables

Spirituality Column #439
April 14, 2015
Current in Carmel-Westfield-Noblesville-Fishers-Zionsville

Praying for Parables
By Bob Walters

I have a not-always-appreciated-by-others gift for sarcastic retort, penchant for sardonic response, talent for nimble-minded quips, and unrepentant respect for a well-turned phrase.

But like many a confessing Christian recently, my rhetorical savoir-faire has been more than a bit flummoxed as Indiana’s originally unremarkable, copycat RFRA law tipped over into the brightly lit, nationally tumultuous ditch of unrelentingly politically correct and factually preposterous assault and over-reaction.

What began as a wise, future-looking legal hedge against as yet unexperienced discrimination became an intellectually D-Day-esque battle royale of hysterical, accusational, Bible-warping, religion bashing histrionics of exactly the kind the law was meant to thwart.  Ironically, the assault was mounted on behalf of LGBT and presumably other groups that are currently among the most civil-rights protected and socially normative minorities in American culture.

Never mind that over the past 50 years virtually every vestige of Christian moral instruction has been tossed out of public schools, higher academia and the political marketplace of common-sense good advice.  It is not fair, the whining chorus shouts, to reaffirm America’s existing First Amendment right to religious freedom.

So, companies that happily do global business with nations routinely killing, maiming, enslaving and silencing public sinners and religious dissenters declare open disdain for unfriendly Indiana, where we Hoosiers are a bunch of bigots and homophobes, and I guess worst of all, Christians.

“But hey – why don’t you visit our new store in Riyadh? Or Beijing?”

At an honest loss for loving, effective rebuttal, I have found myself praying to receive the spiritual gift of parables Jesus so elegantly exhibited when confronted with the Pharisees of His day.  Jesus, un-flummoxed, repeatedly saved his life by telling brilliant parables in response to the accusations of cultural leaders.  I am certain that Jesus’s priority was in revealing God’s glory, power and truth, not just saving His life.

People today, often and mistakenly, think those parables – such as the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37), the Prodigal Son (Luke 15:11-32), and many others (read the middle chapters of Luke) – are there to instruct us in appropriate Christian living.  Not even close.  Those parables, usually in response to Pharisaical accusations, were Jesus’s clever way of “blowing up” the status quo of Jewish piety.

Jesus was a rebel, no doubt.  More importantly He was – He is – a moral, perfect and unimaginably shrewd Savior who sought out sinners not to aid and abet their sin but to love them and teach them about the glory of God.

My parable prayer is not yet answered, but I’ve got this off my chest.

Walters (rlwcom@aol.com), possibly only in his own mind, believes “sarcastic” is a falsehood that mocks a truth, and “sardonic” is a truth that mocks a falsehood.

Archives

Labels

Enter your email address to get updated about new content:

Popular Posts