Monday, July 31, 2017

559 - Visiting Spirit

Spirituality Column No. 559
August 1, 2017
Common Christianity / Uncommon Commentary

Visiting Spirit
By Bob Walters

Among the beautiful woods, hills, lakes, and towns of northern Michigan are situated dozens or maybe hundreds of country Christian churches, happy to see a visitor.
 
I didn’t visit dozens or hundreds of churches these past weeks vacationing up north, but over the years I’ve made it to a few.  I always enjoy walking into a church I don’t know and feeling the immediate fellowship of a savior and Lord I do.
 
That’s the reason to go to church, for the fellowship of likeminded believers. It’s a mistake to think we go to church to feed God or Jesus or to impress the Trinity with our holiness and piety.  That’s kind of a dumb idea because the Trinity – God, Jesus, Spirit – already has the goods on each of us.  I don’t go to church to “get” forgiven – Jesus took care of that on the cross.  And He knows what I’ve been up to the past week.
 
I go to church – wherever it is – to remind myself that I am loved and forgiven by a great God who made me in his image; that I am saved by His perfect radiance and representation that is Jesus Christ who died a horrific death that I might have eternal life; and to fully focus on the indwelling Holy Spirit who I occasionally and sinfully push aside in the rough and tumble of life’s busy and even not-so-busy weeks.
 
Reading the Bible can accomplish much the same thing, of course.  Scripture is a conduit to focus on the divine, to immerse one’s heart in the story of divine grace, and to follow the leading of Christ’s faith, hope and love. And where those three things lead is to church, where we go not just to feed our souls, but to both feed and be nourished by the believing body of Christ.  Church is where our spiritual muscles are strengthened among believers so we can carry God’s word with us out into a challenging world of lost souls.  We need the strength; we share the love; and the world needs the message.
 
An immediate “tell” of a church at work for Christ is the number of children you trip over on the way in.  Eden Bible Church near Beulah, Mich. (30 miles west of Traverse City), is that kind of place.  It was the Sunday before Vacation Bible School week and kids were everywhere.  Adult volunteers and high school student leaders had turned the whole church into Paul’s Roman prison, one of those Bible locations that at first blush might make one flinch but they were going to have a Spirit-led week of teaching and activities using the example of Paul’s unflinching dedication to Jesus.
 
The preacher, a wonderful young guy named Caleb Simerson, asked for a show of hands of those who had helped, and of the 200-300 folks in the service nearly every hand but mine went up.  That’s a Spirit-led church on point and on mission.
 
Caleb’s sermon, “Five Ways to Mature in Christ,” as with many pastors who preach with numbers, actually had about 10 good points (I was taking notes) while only numerically counting up to “Four.”  He used his logging background (yes, logging; it’s northern Michigan) for memorable, simple illustrations, like, “Equipment breaks when it’s cold,” urging us to stay warm in our faith.  Basically the “maturing message” was, “Don’t ever quit; don’t ever think you have finished.”   And I thought, “That’s the spirit!”
 
Walters (rlwcom@aol.com) appreciates and can remember simple illustrations.
Monday, July 24, 2017

558 - Expert Opinion

Spirituality Column No. 558
July 25, 2017
Common Christianity / Uncommon Commentary

Expert Opinion
By Bob Walters

Not long ago I heard Ravi Zacharias describe the decline of Christian authority in our American culture.  And he did it in a loving but effective way.
 
Perhaps the best-known and most widely well-regarded Christian apologist of our age, Zacharias presented the following scenario.  Suppose a public policy panel were convened to discuss the authority and trustworthiness of Christianity.  And now suppose – to provide fair (politically correct) and circumspect (“both sides”) dissection of the topic – the well-rounded panel included a philosopher, a “religious studies” professor, a journalist, a social scientist, an atheist, a feminist, a gay rights activist, a Rabbi, a Muslim cleric, a Catholic priest and an evangelical Christian minister, the last two with deep faith in Christ and thorough academic and preaching knowledge of the Bible.
 
Among that group, which two “expert” voices would be rejected out of hand by secular culture at large as inadequate describers of Christianity because of their bigotry, sexism and their scripturally sound but politically incorrect views on gender identity, right to life and traditional marriage that come with true scriptural comprehension?
 
Of course, Zacharias surmised, it would be the knowledgeable Christians.  Likely, even the Muslim cleric (think of that) and Rabbi would be more trusted: a bleak notion.
 
This isn’t just to set up a “straw man” – an unrealistic example presented to be easily knocked down.  The historic and founding fact of our culture, our United States government, and most of the Western world is the authority of Christianity.  Yet the dismantling and disparaging of authority based on Jesus Christ is a reality in the contemporary world. It has become not only culturally OK but generally revered to be “expert” at anything so long, oxymoronically, as one rejects definitive Christian truth.
 
And let’s assert right here that claiming “Christian authority” is far different from saying, specifically, that America is a “Christian nation.”  I think it is fair to describe America as a secular nation.  Its founders were mostly Christian but the Enlightenment era that so heavily promoted “the rights of man” also created in the 18th century a sort of hybrid philosophical environment.  It strengthened humanity’s view of personal freedom and self-determination, but also depended vigorously and finally upon Christian values of love, charity and service to others to make responsible cultural freedom possible.
 
Those of us who understand Jesus Christ to be the way, the truth, and the life (John 14:6) understand that what is most important is what Jesus has already done for us, not what a “Christian” government is supposed to do for us.  Yes, we are compelled in love to “do for others,” but Jesus on the cross freed us both from the slavery of our sins and from the confining legalistic coercion of false, worldly, soul-stifling masters.
 
In Christ, the new, eternal game in town was and still is gracious, selfless love.
 
I like Zacharias’s “panel” example because it reveals the pervasive tyranny of secularism’s fresh slavery: man-made morality and its attempt to overwrite humanity’s ultimate freedom won through Christ’s expression on the cross of God’s infinite love.
 
Shall we trust the authority of legalism’s whip … or of love’s grace?
 
I prefer to be expert on the latter.
 
Walters (rlwcom@aol.com) posits: gracious, selfless love is a one way street toward Jesus. The secular world asks, “What’s in it for me?”
Monday, July 17, 2017

557 - The Objective Case

Spirituality Column No. 557
July 18, 2017
Common Christianity / Uncommon Commentary

The Objective Case
By Bob Walters

My dad, John L. Walters, was a newspaper reporter and city editor at the Battle Creek (Mich.) Enquirer and News from 1955 until 1963.

That’s when he left journalism to take a corporate communications job at the Chrysler Transmission plant in Kokomo, Ind., beginning work there just a few weeks before President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in November 1963.  In February 1964 our family (dad, mom and four kids) moved to Indiana, as it turns out and for historical perspective, the same weekend the Beatles first appeared on the Ed Sullivan Show.  So that was a while ago, and I’ve been a Hoosier ever since.

I was then in fourth grade and it wasn’t for another few years when I began to show some writing aptitude and made the high school newspaper staff as a freshman that I remember talking with dad about journalism.  He always had told newspaper stories but, prior to my teen years, all I really remembered was stopping into the Enquirer newsroom after church occasionally where they had this amazing new device called a “Xerox” machine.  It could copy the image of whatever you put under the flap cover.

I had no idea what dad actually did at the Enquirer – I was five or six years old at the time – but one Sunday he “copied” my plastic sunglasses on that Xerox machine.  That just seemed so … magical.  It wasn’t until later, in the years leading up to my own education and career in journalism, that I paid close attention to the way dad described what I am very sure was the golden era of American journalism; now long passed.

Dad told the story of weeping at his typewriter on April 12, 1955 – as the father of two young children (my sister Linda and me; younger siblings Joe and Debbie came along a little later) – while editing the wire story about the public release of Jonas Salk’s vaccine for polio, a disease Dad’s children would now not have to fear or endure.

Working as a stringer (part-timer) for Associated Press in Detroit, Dad, a non-golfer, was assigned to cover the U.S. Open being played in Michigan.  Grousing around the press tent about how he didn’t know anything about golf, legendary AP national sports columnist Will Grimsley looked up at Dad and said, “Y’know John, we have guys downtown writing about murders every day but they never committed one.”

And then one story that truly stuck in my mind was Dad’s coverage of a labor dispute at the Clark Equipment factory in Battle Creek.  Intent on finding facts, truth, and covering the disagreement fairly, Dad noted that when it was over, principals from both sides told him privately how angry they got at Dad’s writing, but admitted he never published an untruth.  To me, that is the core of journalistic objectivity and integrity.

How does this relate to Jesus?  Well, Dad for sure was no Bible thumping doctrinaire, but he was a traditional Episcopalian who knew that objective truth was a real thing and that a slanted, partisan agenda had no real place in hard news coverage.

I am sorry my father died (1991) before I found my faith in Christ (2001).  I would like to have known what he thought, objectively, with his humanity, humor and honor.

It would be quite a story.

Walters (rlwcom@aol.com) learned to type by fifth grade; a big deal in the 1960s.
Monday, July 10, 2017

556 - Covering the Truth

Spirituality Column No. 556
July 11, 2017
Common Christianity / Uncommon Commentary
 
Covering the Truth
By Bob Walters
 
There was that plainly anti-Muslim “The Perfect Man” billboard on Indianapolis’ east side last month that listed six pretty heinous deeds from 1,600 years ago.
 
It was a willful hack job on the Prophet Muhammad that I think was in poor taste, unnecessarily incendiary, definitely impolite, and for sure kicked up a short-lived ruckus.  In empathy, let me say there is plenty in my own life I’d rather not see on a billboard.
 
The media’s immediate reporting and follow-up of the religious kerfuffle was a routine, contemporary hue and cry of political incorrectness that was sadly predictable in its uniformly uninformed assertions and narrative.  I doubt anyone learned anything useful from either the billboard message or the general media’s misguided reaction to it.
 
But a deeply teachable moment it is.  Here’s why.
 
Religion is among the hardest things to cover because if a reporter is not a believer, he’ll not have empathy for the seriousness of any religious faith.  If the reporter is a believer, coverage will likely bear the tint of bias bent toward those beliefs and away from and probably askew to the doctrine being covered.  Even a solidly “objective” but inexpert reporter can easily miss the nuance of what a religious story truly means.
 
So coverage of the billboard went Internet viral for a few days with declamations of Islamophobia and venom for the “bigot” who posted it.  Indianapolis media rushed to cover a local ecumenical group-hug photo-op among religious leaders gathered to proclaim “solidarity” of all people of faith.  Catholics, Jews, Buddhists, Protestant and Bible Christians, Muslims and maybe a few others affirmed, “Isn’t that billboard awful!
 
But to date, I’ve heard no one in the media ask the first question that should have been asked.  Nor has there been media mention of the billboard’s glaring non sequitur.
 
OK, maybe the first question legitimately is, “Who put up that sign?”  And yes, the media covered that one.  But the deeper, primal, slate-clearing question no media seemingly cared about, bothered with, or even knew how to ask is this: “Is it true?”
 
A further “tell” that the media “fix” was in came a few days later when an IUPUI liberal arts professor penned a guest editorial in the Indianapolis Star announcing his fight against “Islamophobia.”  Nothing about seeking truth or doctrinal clarity, just, “Don’t be an Islamophobe!” And my first clue that the good professor grasps no handle on the historical merits of the billboard was when his first explanation of it was “The Crusades.”
 
The “heinous deeds” credited to Muhammad were recorded by Muslim historians in the 7th and 8th centuries praising the Prophet’s life.  Yes, praising … some 300 years before the Crusades.  Muhammad is a different kind of “perfect” in the eyes of Islam, but not sinless.  There is in fact a perfect, sinless human claimed by Islam, but it is not Muhammad.  It is an earlier prophet in the Qur’an whom, you may be surprised to learn, Muslims revere as the only “sinless” man, who never died, and whom Muslims believe is alive in Paradise.  That prophet is Jesus of Nazareth, whom Christians call Christ.
 
You can look it up (Holy Qur'an, Sura 3:55), but for God’s sake, at least ask if it is true.
 
Walters (rlwcom@aol.com) advises: seek truth, but try to be nice about it.
Monday, July 3, 2017

555 - Truth and Freedom

Spirituality Column No. 555
July 4, 2017
Common Christianity / Uncommon Commentary

Truth and Freedom
By Bob Walters

"But the fact being once established, that the press is impotent when it abandons itself to falsehood, I leave to others to restore it to its strength, by recalling it within the pale of truth." —Thomas Jefferson (1805)
 
I love freedom of the press.  I’ve studied it.  I get it.  I defend it.
 
Though I like to joke that my own journalism degree (Franklin College, 1976) was squandered by several years working as a newspaper sportswriter, I was never very far personally – in spirit or function – from the larger themes of public information and mass communications.  Perhaps it’s a career irony that most of my private reading and interests since college have centered on politics and history, not sports.  It was always the people in sports I found truly interesting anyway, not the sports themselves.
 
Since 2001 those intellectual interests have been considerably added to with the Bible and the enthusiastic study of nearly 2,000 years of Christian thought, religious philosophy, doctrinal development and church history.  I found faith in Christ at age 47 and suddenly a bevy of scholarly and preacherly companions appeared alongside me to help navigate my faith journey to a confident trust in Jesus Christ.  These folks – who I mention often in these weekly essays – revealed a deep, wonderful and mysterious ocean of Christian truth, peace, wisdom and purpose.  Question my discernment and discipline if you like – I do all the time – but Jesus is the solid rock of truth in this life.
 
Not “my” solid truth; “the” solid truth.  Not me, not my opinion, not church:  Jesus.
 
So going back to journalism as an issue within the context of truth, I find some solace in the fact that Thomas Jefferson who penned not only the American Declaration of Independence but also the Bill of Rights – freedom of the press, etc. – to have been confounded (see quote above) in his age by journalistic malfeasance.  Every time I see a dust-up in church or in the Christian community or among different religions, it is rare to see one that hasn’t happened multiple times over the centuries.  Similarly, in a free society journalists tend to push their own agendas.  That’s not cynicism or hate speech any more than studying the Great Schism of the 11th century is an indictment of the Roman Catholic or Eastern Orthodox churches.  It’s just how it is. Agendas happen.
 
But there are times – and this is one of those times – that the American Experiment would be well served by earnest media truth-telling rather than hyperbolic obeisance to fashion and fancy.  Perhaps some of you also notice today a pervasive “backwardness” to how news stories are covered and social narratives are asserted.  Things we should probably worry about – domestic security and international terrorism come to mind – are pooh-poohed with claims of phobias.  Private preferences of sexuality that have  always been with us but, shall we say, will never propagate the species, are celebrated with specious huzzahs of courage and heroism.  Religion is covered with politically correct themes rather than academically rigorous investigation.  Truth suffers.
 
Freedom requires truth to realize human purpose, life’s desires and God’s glory.
 
I pray for American journalism to regain its strength by getting the message.
 
Walters (rlwcom@aol.com), who understood tennis because he played it, will return to visit God’s truth and American journalism in the coming weeks. Happy 4th!
Fourth of July bonus reading ...


 

Archives

Labels

Enter your email address to get updated about new content:

Popular Posts