Monday, January 27, 2014

376 - The Bible as Mere Literature

Spirituality Column #376
January 28, 2014
Current in Carmel-Westfield-Noblesville-Fishers-Zionsville

The Bible as Mere Literature
By Bob Walters

“You are cutting the wood against the grain, using the tool for a purpose it was not intended to serve.” – C.S. Lewis, Selected Literary Essays

Lesser known than his renowned ability to explain Christianity is C.S. Lewis’s stature as one of the world’s first and great professors of English literature.

Prior to the 1900s plenty of literature existed – English and otherwise – but its study was not deemed worthy of the highest levels of academia.  Philosophy, law, theology and natural science had ruled the academy for centuries.  Literature was valued only as it might illuminate one of these more respectable disciplines.

That changed through the first half of the 1900s with Lewis at the forefront.  In 1942 Lewis wrote the still-definitive commentary on John Milton’s 17th century classic “Paradise Lost.”  A decade later, he wrote the definitive survey “16th Century English Literature.”  But his academic career was nearly derailed by his fame as a Christian apologist, publishing what his Oxford and later Cambridge literary colleagues dismissed as academically unserious “popular books.”

A brilliant student and then a philosophy and theology instructor at Oxford in the 1920s, Lewis (1899-1963) as a child had struggled through the early death of his mother and the distant, non-compassion of his father.  Then came the trauma of World War I trench warfare as a British soldier.  Though raised a pious Irish protestant, these challenges took their toll and Lewis slid into atheism.

It would be 1929 before Lewis came to Christ as, he famously said, the “most dejected and reluctant convert in all of England.”  After years of doubt, Lewis became intellectually overwhelmed and convicted that “God was God.”

Perhaps those years as a non-believer were key to Lewis gaining the faith and perception that would lead him to write the game-changing Christian descriptives Mere Christianity, The Screwtape Letters, The Problem of Pain, A Grief Observed, The Chronicles of Narnia, and several others.

Lewis wasn’t a Bible expositor.  He described the faith it took to understand the Bible in terms of the Creator God, the Lordship of Jesus Christ, the abiding of the Holy Spirit and the Trinity’s relationship both within itself and humanity.

While there is certainly great literature and poetry in the Bible, Lewis the expert in literature cautioned against isolating the Bible in the literary realm. He described the Bible as a religious book “so remorselessly and continuously sacred that it … repels the merely aesthetic (literary) approach.”

The Bible, Lewis observed, “demands to be taken on its own terms.”

And the Bible’s terms are God’s, which when properly read are not negotiable.

Walters (rlwcom@aol.com) found the Bible impossible to understand before coming to faith in Christ, the key that unlocks the Bible.

 
Tuesday, January 21, 2014

375 - Stories, Myths and Legends

Spirituality Column #375
January 21, 2014
Current in Carmel-Westfield-Noblesville-Fishers-Zionsville

Stories, Myths and Legends
By Bob Walters

I’m going to go out on a limb and assert the Bible is true.
 
All of it.  Old Testament, New Testament.  All of it.
 
Yes, even the parts we don’t understand, don’t like, don’t match up with science, seem unfair, and generally put the ball of wisdom and glory in God’s court at every turn.
 
Just to be clear … all true.  The Bible.  That’s what I’m saying.
 
You’ll notice this conflicts with what the general media, most educational institutions, halls of government and sadly more than a few churches present as “truth.”  Biblical references are minimized, misrelated (if not completely misunderstood), taken out of context, not taken seriously … or mocked when they are taken seriously.
 
Our current, broadband public narrative of biblical reality is “Yes there is an old book called the Bible and yes it’s OK to develop a light grasp of what’s in it.  But beware of people who actually believe everything they read in the Bible and pray sincerely for the One True God’s leading, interpretation and wisdom.  They must be excluded from representing mainstream thought and offering intellectual instruction.”
 
That’s how society rolls rather than embracing the Bible as God’s authoritative voice of moral truth and God-glorifying, freeing love for all humanity.
 
You’d think we’d “get that” in a nation founded on God-given human freedom.

But no.  Acceptable truth is relative truth, the province of smart folks – editors, professors, administrators, politicians, activists, entertainers, cultural icons, scientists – who find God’s existence unproven and God’s truth mere superstition.  They insist empirical knowledge generated in human brains supersedes faith and must command dominance over the dangerous, outdated, disproven machinations of the Bible.

This is the tyranny of the biblically uninformed, not the blessing of the intellectually superior.  This is the misdirection of those who see in the Bible faux stories, myths, and legends – untrue and entirely open to modern man’s most convenient application or denial.  This is the dark, cynical, mischievous insincerity of those who reinterpret social structures favorable to modern, self-serving thought, never seriously considering the possibility that God’s truth once remains God’s truth forever.

The Bible tells of branches and vines and fruit and the Kingdom of God.  Properly understood, John 15 makes it plain that separating ourselves and our truth from the Bible separates our entire society from God, from Jesus Christ, from the Holy Spirit, and from their holy, unwavering and unending trustworthiness.

The Bible’s stories, myths and legends reveal truth larger than mankind.  Always.

Walters (rlwcom@aol.com) is floored when those who do not believe in the Bible are positioned in the media as experts on the Bible.  It’s a fool’s exercise, like pontificating on the baseball rulebook without ever witnessing a game.

 
Monday, January 13, 2014

374 - Humble Opinions, God's Truth

Spirituality Column #374
January 14, 2014
Current in Carmel-Westfield-Noblesville-Fishers-Zionsville

Humble Opinions, God’s Truth
By Bob Walters

I suppose I’m as politically and socially opinionated as anyone I know.

And I know some very opinionated folks.

But let’s explore how God’s truth is distinct from and superior to human opinion.

For starters, nothing frosts someone who has an opinion more than someone else who has the truth.  And nothing is more commonly troublesome in human relationships than confusing opinion with truth.  All kinds of religions are full of all kinds of people with all kinds of political and social opinions, and certainly all kinds of opinions about the religion itself.  Even non-religious folks have strident opinions about religion.

People form opinions based on available human information, which has the nettlesome short-coming of variable translation depending on a person’s viewpoint, experience, and temporal interest.  Plus, human information is always changing.  Moving target or not, we mistakenly think energetic and clever argument reliably pins down truth.  Hence we argue, often pointlessly, but with gusto nonetheless.

God’s information, on the other hand, does not change.  His truth is both the end of the argumentative line and the beginning of inarguable, eternal love.

The Christian faith starts with Jesus Christ being the truth that never ends.  He doesn’t merely tell the truth, He is the truth.  God is love, Jesus is the truth, and the Holy Spirit informs our souls.  One can legitimately harbor an opinion as to whether this is the best way to describe the Trinity, but that Jesus is God’s truth transcends opinion.

Jesus instructs us to worship God the Father in the truth (John 4:23) and that we will know the truth through His teaching (John 8:31).  Jesus the author of truth asserts that the truth will set us free (John 8:32), and tells us He is the truth (John 14:6).  Jesus prays by God’s truth (John 17:17), and constantly says, “I tell you the truth … .

I tend to be in prima facia agreement with people who say religion is an opinion because there are so many human shadings to church life and faith doctrines.  It’s unavoidable that any church full up with human beings will be full up with opinions, while any church that is full up with God will be full up with truth.

Honestly, or perhaps I should say, in my opinion, that is a church we would rarely experience because that would be the exact church of the mind of Christ.  Humanity isn’t there yet.  But we go to church, pray often, read scripture and serve others in humility, all in order to encounter the only truth unhindered by earthly opinion.

And that is Jesus Christ.

Walters (rlwcom@aol.com) finds that airing one’s worldly opinions darkens one’s ability to illuminate Christ’s truth.
Monday, January 6, 2014

373 - A (Duck) Call to Christ

Spirituality Column #373
January 7, 2014
Current in Carmel-Westfield-Noblesville-Fishers-Zionsville

A (Duck) Call to Christ
By Bob Walters

Christians develop an ear for identifying like-minded believers.

Not that all Christians are like-minded – we most decidedly are not – but sheep know their master’s voice (John 10:3, 4, 16, 27).  It shouldn’t be surprising that we can discern the voice of other sheep in our flock.

For example, when we hear the phrase “on my heart” – church-speak shorthand for “God has prayerfully put something on my heart” – we’ve likely encountered another Bible-believing evangelical.   The expression typically means a person feels “led” – another Christian code word – to “speak the truth in love” (Ephesians 4:15).

Christianity teaches that God’s laws are written “on our hearts” in faith.  The Bible is very plain about that (Romans 2:15, 2:29; 2 Corinthians 3:2-3).  People are saved by their faith in Christ, period (John 14:6), not their good works.

Christians properly “feel led” because Jesus says “Follow me” a couple dozen times in the Gospels.  Never once does Christ volunteer, or even remotely suggest, that He has any interest in following us.  Jesus came to lead, and to reveal the truth.

As for “speaking the truth in love,” Jesus did that a lot.  His message of faith inspired some but incensed others.  Jesus as the “fulfillment of the law” (Matthew 5:17) was something neither religious nor civil authorities wanted to hear, nor what His Jewish brethren were prepared to accept.  Jesus’s wisdom was respected and his miracles were spectacular, but His humility was mocked and His truth was attacked.

The truth of Jesus Christ has always been challenged by arrogant mankind because Christ’s truth, truly, is “the final answer.”  It is superior to any temporal “truth” – legends, societal “norms,” academic whims, political causes or spiritual fashions – created by self-praising man.

John 15:18 says not to be surprised when Christian believers are hated because the world hated Jesus first.  Modern cultural Pharisees still take Christians to task for publicly espousing the plain, scriptural totality of God’s truth in Jesus Christ.  And perhaps the three most important truths are that 1) God loves us, 2) salvation depends on faith in Christ, and 3) our human sin is a very big deal.

The Pharisees and the Romans killed the messenger who brought that message 2,000 years ago.  Many try to kill the message today.

“Duck Commander” impresario Phil Robertson, I’m guessing, can relate.  Witness the furious but mostly silly, self-righteous and biblically uninformed cultural backlash ignited by Robertson’s recent plainly spoken and scripturally-buttressed assessment of sin, love, truth and modern culture.

If we have an ear for it, we can recognize a faithful voice from our flock.

Even if it is a duck call.

Walters (rlwcom@aol.com) doesn’t hunt, but appreciates God’s truth. Have a happy, happy, happy New Year.

Archives

Labels

Enter your email address to get updated about new content:

Popular Posts